Seat of Arbitration: London (LCIA) vs. Paris (ICC) - Which is Best for Your Company?

Seat of Arbitration: London (LCIA) vs. Paris (ICC) - Which is Best for Your Company?

When drafting complex contracts with international partners, the "Seat" of arbitration is often relegated to the end of negotiations. However, choosing between London (Court of International Arbitration - LCIA) and Paris (International Chamber of Commerce - ICC) has direct implications for how the conflict will be resolved.

London vs. Paris: Key Differences

  • London (LCIA): Often chosen for contracts in English and governed by Common Law. Very agile response times and a strong tradition in financial disputes.
  • Paris (ICC): Home to the most prestigious commercial arbitration in the world. Offers a case management structure (Court of Arbitration) that ensures rigorous scrutiny of the final award.
  • Costs: Both are high-cost options; SD&MP evaluates whether your business scale justifies these seats or if regional options (such as Johannesburg) are more suitable.

Choosing the wrong seat can mean that a local judge in the seat country can interfere with the arbitrators' decision. At SD&MP, we review your arbitration clauses to ensure the chosen seat offers the neutrality and "finality" your investment demands.

Going to sign a million-dollar contract? Consult us on the strategic drafting of arbitration clauses.

Don't let your company be held hostage by judicial delays.

Consult us on how to structure your dispute resolution clauses.